ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science



Information about the scientific journal

Submit an article to the journal

Requirements to the article



Journal archive

Tracing of postal items


Editorial Board       p-ISSN 2308-4944 (print)       e-ISSN 2409-0085 (online)
SOI: 1.1/TAS         DOI: 10.15863/TAS

Journal Archive

ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science 11(67) 2018

Philadelphia, USA

* Scientific Article * Impact Factor 6.630

Tariq, M., Inayat, H. R., & Zaffar, H.

Outcome of open versus closed hemorrhoidectomy.

Full Article: PDF

Scientific Object Identifier:


Language: English

Citation: Tariq, M., Inayat, H. R., & Zaffar, H. (2018). Outcome of open versus closed hemorrhoidectomy. ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, 11 (67), 334-337. Soi: Doi:

Pages: 334-337

Published: 30.11.2018

Abstract: Objective: This study was conducted to determine benefits of closed and open hemorrhoidectomy. Design and Duration: Study comprises on the duration of 6 months from January 2018 to June 2018. This is a cross sectional study of prospective type. Setting: Study was conducted in Nishter Hospital Multan, a city of Pakistan. Patients and Methods: All patients admitted in general surgery ward of the study hospital with hemorrhoids and planned for surgery were included in this study. These cases were admitted in study duration of six months. Both male and female cases were included irrespective of their age. An inclusion and exclusion criteria was formed according to which patients were selected. Data was analyzed using SPSS software and presented via tables and graphs. Results: There were 120 cases included in this study. Two groups of patients were formed containing equal number of cases 60 in each. Age range was 20-65 years with mean age of 35.5 years. Signs and symptoms were recorded on day one, after one week, one month and after 4 months. All data was recorded. On day one all 120 cases experienced anal pain, rectal bleeding was seen in 40 cases from group A and 55 cases from group-B, Post operative retention of urine was seen in 3 cases from group A and % cases from group-B. After 4 months duration in group-A, constipation was noted in 10 cases, anal pain in 2 cases, rectal bleeding in 3 cases and anal stenosis in 3 cases while in group-B anal pain was seen in one case, rectal bleeding in 2 cases, constipation in 4 cases and fecal incontinence in 2 cases was reported. Conclusion: Closed method of hemorrhoidectomy is better than open method with early recovery, less pain and few complications. While in open method there is chance of anal stenosis and injury to anal sphincter.

Key words: open Hemorrhoidectome, closed hemorrhoidectomy, anal stenosis, anal pain.








© «Theoretical &Applied Science»                      2013 г.