Full Article: PDF
Scientific Object Identifier: http://s-o-i.org/1.1/TAS-01-117-25
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2023.01.117.25
Language: English
Citation: Turaev, N. (2023). Imam Bukhari’s methodology on the controversy of narrations. ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, 01 (117), 414-417. Soi: http://s-o-i.org/1.1/TAS-01-117-25 Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2023.01.117.25 |
Pages: 414-417
Published: 30.01.2023
Abstract: Imam Bukhari's work "al-Tarikh al-Kabir" (the Great book of history) received the recognition of scholars as it contains important information about ilal al-hadith. Considering that this work is the author's largest book of his views on the science of hadith, it is the main source for studying the author's views on ilal al-hadith. The term “ikhtilaf al-hadith” is used to refer to the difference between narrations, that is, the meaning appears to be contradictory to each other. And giving priority to one of them requires additional research. This type of difference was given great importance by the muhaddiths, and the comparative study of narrations was considered preferable to recording many hadiths. For example, it is narrated that Abdurrahman ibn Mahdi said, “knowing the “illa” (fault) of one hadith which I have is more beloved to me than writing down twenty hadiths that I do not know"[4, p. 359].
Key words: Imam Bukhari, al-Tarikh al-kabir, illa, ilal al-hadith, ikhtilaf al-hadith, mawsul, mursal, mawquf, marfu’.
|
