Information about the scientific journal
Submit an article to the journal
Requirements to the article
Section
Indexing
Journal archive
Tracing of postal items
Cooperation
Editorial Board
|
|
Philadelphia, USA |
|
* Scientific Article * Impact Factor 6.630 |
|
Bilich, S. R., Belysheva, V. S., Blagorodov, A. A., Prokhorov, V. T., & Volkova, G. Yu.
Criteria for assessing the support settlements of the Russian Arctic to ensure both external and internal security of the population of the Arctic Zones and the socio-economic development of the regions of the Russian Arctic. |
|
|
Full Article: PDF
Scientific Object Identifier: http://s-o-i.org/1.1/TAS-10-126-7
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2023.10.126.7
Language: English
Citation: Bilich, S. R., Belysheva, V. S., Blagorodov, A. A., Prokhorov, V. T., & Volkova, G. Yu. (2023). Criteria for assessing the support settlements of the Russian Arctic to ensure both external and internal security of the population of the Arctic Zones and the socio-economic development of the regions of the Russian Arctic. ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, 10 (126), 77-92. Soi: http://s-o-i.org/1.1/TAS-10-126-7 Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2023.10.126.7 |
Pages: 77-92
Published: 30.10.2023
Abstract: The article reflects the result of a detailed analysis of all Arctic settlements in Russia with a population of more than 500 people. taking into account not only standard statistical parameters, but also specially collected data on the location of medical and educational organizations, logistics infrastructure (including the largest civilian warehouses of fuels and lubricants), proximity to licensed areas for mining, etc. The research work carried out is a basis for identifying the supporting settlements of the Russian Arctic. The detail of the analysis allows us to form a flexible system of criteria for support settlements in the field of external and internal security, as centers of socio-cultural support for the population of the Arctic, centers of service and administrative support for the implementation of resource projects.
Key words: competitiveness, demand, quality, accessibility, innovation, digital technology, economic policy, industrial policy, union of federal, regional and municipal branches of government; profitability, profit, financial stability, stability, purchasing power.
|
|