Blagorodov, A. A., Prokhorov, V. T., & Volkova, G. Y.
On the importance of the symbiosis of the northern sea route and the railway for the effective implementation of the development strategy of the Russian Arctic. |
 |
Full Article: PDF
Scientific Object Identifier: http://s-o-i.org/1.1/TAS-11-115-16
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2022.11.115.16
Language: English
Citation: Blagorodov, A. A., Prokhorov, V. T., & Volkova, G. Y. (2022). On the importance of the symbiosis of the northern sea route and the railway for the effective implementation of the development strategy of the Russian Arctic. ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, 11 (115), 401-415. Soi: http://s-o-i.org/1.1/TAS-11-115-16 Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2022.11.115.16 |
Pages: 401-415
Published: 30.11.2022
Abstract: in the article, the authors drew the attention of the leaders of the Russian Arctic regions to the need for a symbiosis of the sea route and the railway, which is possible with a large-scale modernization of two Siberian railway arteries. The first stage of the project (2016-2020) worth 562.4 billion rubles. (reduced as a result of the audit to 520.5 billion rubles) provides for an increase in the carrying capacity of the BAM and the Trans-Siberian Railway in the direction of seaports and border crossings of the Far East to 124.9 million tons (+66.8 million tons compared to 2018) . In 2022 alone, Russian Railways will spend 30 billion rubles on the development of the Eastern railway range. At the second stage (2021-2025), it is necessary to build 1,310 km of additional main tracks, 32 sidings and reconstruct 29 stations, as a result of which cargo transportation along highways will increase to 182 million tons, and by 2025, according to the new order of the president, up to 200 million tons. In total, it is planned to spend about 493.2 billion rubles for these purposes, but these costs will be justified, since the throughput of goods using the Northern Sea Route will increase significantly.
Key words: infrastructure, strategy, development, cost, profitability, financial condition, profit, value of TEP, economic potential, accessibility, priority, preferences.
|
